The growing endorsement of Yazid b. Mu‘awiyah (LA) and his followers have become ever so prevalent today that it has conveniently cleared Yazid of any responsibility for the entirety of Karbala and instead shifts the blame onto the commanders, most notably Ibn Ziyad. In order to prove Yazid is responsible for Karbala, we only need to establish his support and command for al-Husayn’s death, which is undeniable when revising the historical accounts.

This series presented before you is not a simple retelling of the martyrdom of Imam al-Husayn (AS), but rather a comprehensive study of its historical, theological, and moral significance. Instead of focusing on 'what' happened in Karbala, we focus on 'why' did it happen and 'why' it's as significant as we claim it to be, with compelling evidence from both Shi'a and Sunni sources. Below is a list of the chapters included in this series:

Our series on Ghadir proved and established the declaration of Imam Ali’s (as) authority over the Ummah. However, some miscellaneous objections to this understanding were not mentioned. Below we shall cover some of the popular objections, which are as follows: - Why didn’t the Prophet ﷺ declare Ghadeer on ‘Arafah? - Is Hadith Ghadeer an ambiguous designation (Nass Khafi)? - Did al-Hasan al-Muthana reject Ghadeer’s interpretation? - Why did the Sahaba Ignore Ghadeer?